Jürgen Klopp regards Watford loss as ‘rather positive’ for Liverpool

Jürgen Klopp insisted Liverpool will “go again” after suffering their first Premier League defeat of the season at the hands of Watford, and went on to insist that it could actually prove a positive for his players because it frees them of the burden of attempting to win the title with an unbeaten record.

Liverpool received Vicarage Road on the rear of a run of 44 games unbeaten within the league, the last 18 of which were victories. A 19th here would have set a top‑flight record and seemed a certainty given they were facing opponents who sat within the relegation zone at kick-off, having not won any of their last five league games. But instead Nigel Pearson’s men recorded a powerful and fully deserved victory, scoring all of their three goals within the last half , with Ismaïla Sarr their undoubted star. The Senegal winger, making his first start in over a month having been sidelined with a hamstring injury, scored the hosts’ opening two goals before assisting Troy Deeney for the third. agen sbobet online terpercaya maxbetsbobet.org

“The most vital thing is congratulations to Watford, well deserved,” said Klopp. “The half there have been football things that didn’t compute for us and overall we didn’t create enough and that’s what results in a defeat. But it’s only one football and that we need to admit that Watford was the higher team.”

Asked if he cared that Liverpool could not emulate Arsenal’s Invincibles of 2004, or indeed match or better their 49-game unbeaten run within the league, Klopp said: “Not really, because I don’t think you’ll break records because you would like to interrupt records. You break records because you’re 100% focused on each step.

“It was clear that at a while we might lose a game. We didn’t await it but it had been clear that it might happen. Tonight it happened. I see it rather positive. Because from now on we will play free football again. We don’t need to defend or attempt to get the record we just can attempt to win football games again.”

Liverpool, who produced just one shot on track and defensively were poor, are still well on track to win the title given they sit 22 points beyond Manchester City – albeit having played a game more – and need only 12 points from their last 10 fixtures to be crowned champions for the primary time since 1990. Their next league game is reception to Bournemouth on Saturday, while they visit Chelsea within the FA Cup on Tuesday.

For Watford, the priority is avoiding relegation and that they will feel that’s quite possible after this win, not only due to who it came against but also because it lifts them out of rock bottom three, albeit on goal difference.

“To beat the simplest club side within the world is testament to how we played,” said Pearson, for whom the sole negative of this game was the knee injury sustained within the half by Gerard Deulofeu, which required him to travel to hospital and is probably going to stay him out of action for a few time. “It’s very satisfying but it’s only one game. We’ve got 10 games left and that we have gotten to undertake to emulate what we’ve done today in terms of performance.”

Manchester City lodge appeal against two-year Uefa ban and fine

Manchester City have registered their appeal to the court of arbitration for sport (Cas) against the ruling by Uefa’s club financial control body (CFCB) that the club overstated its sponsorships from 2012-16, and therefore the sanctions of a two-year ban from the Champions League and €30m (£25m) fine.

City had said on 14 February they might immediately appeal, during a very strongly worded statement rejecting the findings of the CFCB’s adjudicatory chamber (AC) that the club had committed “serious breaches” of Uefa’s financial fair play rules by overstating the sponsorships.

Although the AC’s members, mostly senior European lawyers including English barrister Charles Flint QC, won’t have their reasons for the findings published until after the Cas decision, the overstatement is known principally to concern City’s main sponsorship by the Abu Dhabi state airline, Etihad. City’s owner, Sheikh Mansour, may be a senior member of the Abu Dhabi ruling family, and internal City emails published by the German magazine Der Spiegel in November 2018 suggested that Mansour was funding the majority of the £67.5m Etihad sponsorship. City have vehemently denied wrongdoing.

Cas said during a statement it had registered the appeal by City, which is “directed against the choice of the adjudicatory chamber of the Uefa club financial control body”. Cas said it could give no timescale for the appeal, which needs each side to submit written arguments and evidence, then a hearing before a panel of three lawyers, who haven’t yet been appointed. judi bola terbaik judibolaterbaik.co

If the method is concluded by early summer, as City’s chief executive, Ferran Soriano, has said he hopes for, then City are going to be excluded from subsequent two seasons’ Champions League competitions if the ban is upheld. If the method isn’t concluded by the time next season’s Uefa competitions start, City are going to be clear to play in 2020-21, then if upheld by Cas, the ban will become for the subsequent two seasons.

In 2018 Milan’s appeal to Cas against an AC decision to ban the club from Uefa competitions for 2 years was concluded within three months. Cas upheld the AC’s finding that Milan breached FFP financial limits, but annulled the two-year ban and sent the sanction back to the AC for reconsideration. Uefa and Milan then settled on a one-year ban, and although Uefa will normally be expected to defend the choices and processes of the CFCB at a Cas appeal, discussions a few settlement can happen at this stage.

City were reported within the legal press to possess instructed the renowned constitutional barrister David Pannick QC as an addition to their legal team for the Cas appeal. Pannick, who successfully argued at the supreme court against Boris Johnson’s government’s proroguing of parliament last year is within the same London chambers, Blackstone, as Flint.